Ever poured your heart into a creative project for three years, only to finally see a payday that sends your tax bill into the stratosphere? That's the artist's tax dilemma in a nutshell. You're not making corporate money month after month – you're riding a financial rollercoaster where one year you're eating two-minute noodles, and the next you've finally sold that book, scored that commission, or landed that exhibition deal. The Australian tax system gets this, which is why income averaging for artists and authors exists – a tax concession specifically designed for creatives whose income doesn't follow a predictable beat.
Income averaging is essentially a government-sanctioned time machine for your taxes. Instead of being hammered with massive tax bills during your big-earning years, this provision lets you smooth your income across a rolling four-year average. The result? Potentially tens of thousands of dollars saved when your creative work finally pays off. Yet despite being on the books since the early 1990s, income averaging remains one of the most underutilised and misunderstood tax concessions available to Australian creatives.
Let's break down exactly what income averaging means for artists and authors, who qualifies, and how you can leverage this powerful tax strategy without getting caught in the compliance weeds.
Income averaging for artists and authors in Australia operates under Division 405 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997. Rather than taking the full hit of marginal tax rates on your actual income in high-earning years, you calculate tax based on your average taxable professional income (ATPI) from the previous four years.
Here's where it gets interesting: the system uses a unique calculation method that divides your above-average income into two parts. The bottom 20% gets taxed at normal marginal rates, while the top 80% is taxed at four times the normal rate on that 20% slice. This effectively spreads your tax burden over five years, significantly reducing what you'd otherwise owe.
The formula works particularly well for creatives experiencing "lumpy" income patterns – those years of minimal earnings while developing work, followed by substantial payments upon completion or publication. Without this concession, you'd face disproportionately high tax rates during your successful years, effectively penalising you for the natural rhythm of creative work.
The first four years after entering the system follow special phase-in rules that make income averaging extraordinarily generous for new participants:
These generous provisions mean first-year participants can achieve an effective tax-free threshold of approximately $90,000 on eligible professional income – potentially saving around $20,000 in tax during that crucial first year when your creative career finally takes off.
The Australian Taxation Office recognises five categories of "special professionals" eligible for income averaging. Understanding these classifications is critical because eligibility isn't automatic – you need to genuinely fit within one of these defined categories.
Authors and Inventors: This includes writers, composers, sculptors, photographers, and inventors. The term "author" here is technical – it means the creator of the original work under copyright law. Interestingly, computer programmers are specifically recognised as eligible "writers" for averaging purposes.
Performing Artists: Individuals using intellectual, artistic, musical, physical, or personal skills in front of audiences, or performing in films, recordings, television, or radio broadcasts. This covers musicians, actors, dancers, and other live performers.
Production Associates: Those providing artistic (not technical) support to performing artists, including art directors, choreographers, costume designers, directors, directors of photography, film editors, lighting designers, musical directors, producers, production designers, and set designers.
Inventors: Creators of patented or inventable items beyond artistic works.
Sportspersons: Competitors in sporting activities primarily requiring physical prowess, strength, or stamina, including navigators in car rallying and coxswains in rowing.
To become eligible for income averaging, you must:
Once you hit that $2,500 threshold in your "Professional Year 1," eligibility continues automatically in subsequent years – even if your income subsequently drops below $2,500. You don't need to maintain residency for every subsequent year either. This is crucial: income averaging is a one-way street. Once you're in, you're in for life.
The real-world tax savings from income averaging can be substantial, particularly during high-income years and when first entering the system. Let's look at actual examples from the research data.
The most dramatic benefits occur in Year 1. With a nil average income, eligible professionals can potentially pay zero tax on professional income up to approximately $90,000 (assuming no other income sources). A professional writer with $91,500 in professional income would owe $9,460.65 without averaging. With averaging applied in the first year, that liability drops to just $1,154.92 – saving $8,305.73.
A composer with total taxable income of $219,830 (including professional income) would face a tax bill of $67,399.81 without income averaging. With averaging applied, that tax liability plummets to $21,746.80 – a saving of $45,653. That's not pocket change; that's the difference between financial stress and breathing room.
Over a five-year period with fluctuating income ($50,000, $75,000, $120,000, $40,000, $130,000), cumulative tax with averaging totals $68,526.40 compared to $87,393 without averaging – total savings of $18,866.60 across the period.
Here's a comparison table showing how income averaging performs across different income scenarios:
| Scenario | Total Income | Tax Without Averaging | Tax With Averaging | Tax Saved |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| First-year writer | $91,500 | $9,460.65 | $1,154.92 | $8,305.73 |
| Established composer | $219,830 | $67,399.81 | $21,746.80 | $45,653.00 |
| Five-year performer (cumulative) | $415,000 | $87,393.00 | $68,526.40 | $18,866.60 |
| Basic example (author) | $60,000 | $9,967.00 | $7,942.00 | $2,025.00 |
Not all income qualifies for averaging, and this is where many creatives trip up. Understanding what counts as "taxable professional income" (TPI) versus what doesn't is essential for maximising benefits and staying compliant.
The ATO is clear about what doesn't qualify:
This distinction creates important planning opportunities. An artist with both eligible creative income and non-eligible employment income can ensure each is appropriately classified to maximise the benefit. For instance, if you're a photographer with both wedding photography income and fine art exhibition income, understanding which falls where is crucial.
Your TPI is your assessable professional income minus relevant deductions that reasonably relate to your professional activity. This includes proportional apportionable deductions such as charitable gifts. Eligible deductions typically include:
Income averaging is frequently misapplied, miscalculated, or completely overlooked by accountants who don't specialise in creative industries. Here are the pitfalls that could cost you thousands – or worse, trigger an ATO audit.
Income averaging is a one-way system. You cannot opt out once activated. However – and this is critical – you're never taxed more due to averaging. In years where your income falls below your four-year average, standard tax rates apply with no additional penalty. The system only benefits you; it never hurts you.
The biggest mistake? Assuming all your income qualifies when it doesn't. Teaching income from running photography workshops typically doesn't count as eligible professional income, even if you're a professional photographer. That day job at the cafe while you finish your novel? Not eligible. Your YouTube advertising revenue from music tutorials? Possibly eligible if it's performance-based, but not if it's educational content.
Many general accountants incorrectly apply the ATPI formula, particularly the phase-in rules. They might forget that loss years are treated as nil (not negative numbers), or they miscalculate the unique tax formula that divides above-average income into the 20%/80% split.
Income averaging is only available to individuals. If you've set up a company or trust structure for your creative business, income distributed as dividends, distributions, or wages doesn't qualify for the concession. This is a significant consideration when choosing your business structure – what seems like a sophisticated setup might actually cost you tens of thousands in lost tax benefits.
The ATO scrutinises income averaging claims carefully. Without proper proof of eligibility – contracts showing you're the original creator, position descriptions, invoices demonstrating the nature of your work – you're vulnerable to queries and potential disallowance. Recent case law demonstrates that the ATO takes compliance seriously in this area.
The ATO itself acknowledges that income averaging for special professionals is "a highly specialised field that only a select few have expertise in." This isn't false modesty – it's a genuine warning. Many general accountants lack specific knowledge of these provisions, and outdated advice from even a few years ago may no longer apply given evolving ATO interpretations.
Income averaging sits at the intersection of copyright law, tax law, and creative industry practice. Determining whether you qualify as an "author" under the technical copyright definition, understanding which income streams are assessable, correctly applying the phase-in rules, and calculating the unique tax formula all require specialist knowledge that most general practitioners simply don't have.
Specialist creative industry accountants don't just handle income averaging – they help you maximise adjacent provisions like:
Recent case law shows the ATO carefully examines income averaging claims. Professional advice from accountants specialising in creative industries provides:
Income averaging represents one of the most valuable tax concessions available to Australian artists and authors, yet it remains underutilised because of its complexity and the one-way commitment it requires. The potential savings – particularly that first-year benefit of approximately $20,000 on professional income up to $90,000 – make it a game-changer for creatives transitioning from side hustle to full-time practice.
The key is understanding that income averaging isn't a simple checkbox on your tax return. It's a strategic decision that requires careful evaluation of your income sources, your career trajectory, and your business structure. The permanent nature of the election, the distinction between eligible and non-eligible income, and the importance of proper record-keeping all underscore why specialist guidance is essential.
For artists and authors experiencing the natural volatility of creative income – the years of development followed by breakthrough payments – income averaging transforms the tax system from an obstacle into an ally. It recognises that creative careers don't follow corporate timelines, and it provides genuine relief during high-income years while never penalising you during lean times.
The scheme has been on the books since the early 1990s, updated most recently in May 2025, yet many creatives still don't know it exists. That's money left on the table – potentially tens of thousands of dollars over a creative career. Understanding your eligibility, correctly calculating your benefits, and maintaining compliance aren't DIY projects. This is where accountants who actually understand the creative industries earn their fees many times over.
Yes, but only your eligible professional creative income qualifies for averaging. Your wages from unrelated employment, teaching income, or other non-professional sources are taxed at normal marginal rates and aren't included in the averaging calculation. This creates a strategic advantage, allowing you to support yourself through other work while still benefiting from averaging on your creative income.
Income averaging continues for life once activated. If you cease creative work entirely and no longer earn professional income, you'll simply have nil taxable professional income in subsequent years, which flows into your four-year average calculation. The system remains active but provides no benefit (and no detriment) if you're not earning eligible income. You cannot officially 'exit' the system.
Income averaging is calculated automatically by the ATO based on the information you provide in your supplementary tax return, particularly in the sections designated for special professionals. It’s crucial to accurately classify your income and complete the relevant sections. Specialist accounting advice can help ensure that your taxable professional income is correctly calculated and documented.
No. Income averaging is only available to individuals earning income directly in their personal capacity. Income distributed through trusts or companies – whether as dividends, distributions, or wages – does not qualify for the concession. This is an important consideration when deciding on your business structure.
The most costly mistake is misclassifying income – assuming everything you earn qualifies when it doesn't. For example, teaching workshops, coaching, or unrelated employment income typically doesn't count as eligible professional income. The second major error is not seeking specialist advice, which can lead to miscalculations and potential ATO queries, ultimately costing you significant tax savings.
Sign up to receive relevant advice for your business.
