You've just wrapped a killer photography session for a new café. Instead of cash, they've offered you three months of free coffee and lunch – a decent trade, right? Or maybe you're a graphic designer who's built a website for your mate's band in exchange for some studio time to record your own podcast. Sounds like a fair swap, everyone's happy, and best of all, no money changes hands, so no tax implications… right?
Wrong. And this is where many creative professionals in Australia hit a seriously discordant note with the Australian Taxation Office.
In-kind or contra payments might feel like a casual handshake deal between mates, but the ATO views them through the same lens as cold, hard cash. That coffee you're drinking? That's assessable income. That studio time? Also income. And if you're thinking you can keep these arrangements off the books to simplify your tax return, you're potentially setting yourself up for penalties, interest charges, and a very uncomfortable conversation with the tax office.
Let's demystify in-kind payments and ensure your creative business stays in tune with Australian tax law – without killing the collaborative vibe that makes the creative economy thrive.
In-kind payments (also called contra payments or barter transactions) are arrangements where you exchange goods or services directly without using money as the intermediary. Think of it as the modern evolution of the ancient barter system, but with spreadsheets and GST implications.
According to ATO Taxation Ruling IT 2668, these transactions must be treated identically to cash or credit transactions for income tax and GST purposes. The ATO explicitly states: "Barter transactions are assessable and deductible for income tax purposes to the same extent as other cash or credit transactions."
For creative professionals in 2026, in-kind arrangements are everywhere:
The critical thing to understand is that in-kind payments aren't a tax loophole. They're fully assessable income that must be declared, valued, invoiced, and accounted for properly.
Absolutely. The ATO doesn't care whether you received $5,000 in cash or $5,000 worth of graphic design services – both are assessable income.
This applies to all in-kind arrangements, including:
The timing matters too. According to the ATO, income is assessable "as soon as it is applied or dealt with in any way on your behalf or as you direct" – not when you physically receive it or withdraw it. For platform payments (Patreon, OnlyFans, Ko-fi), this means income is assessable when it's credited to your account, even if you haven't transferred it to your bank yet.
What about GST?
If you're GST-registered (required once your turnover hits $75,000 annually), GST applies to the fair market value of in-kind transactions. Both parties must account for GST as if it was a cash sale – there's no netting off allowed. The GST rate remains 10% on most goods and services.
Here's the kicker: in-kind transactions count towards your GST turnover threshold. If you're doing $60,000 in cash work and $20,000 in contra arrangements, you've crossed the $75,000 threshold and must register for GST.
However, there is some relief. Under ATO Practical Compliance Guideline PCG 2016/18, if your contra transactions make up less than 10% of total supplies, both parties are GST-registered and at arm's length, and several other conditions are met, strict GST reporting burdens may be reduced (though records must still be maintained).
Valuation is where many creatives trip up. You can't just pluck a number from thin air – the ATO expects fair market value, defined as "the price at which property would change hands between a willing buyer and a willing seller, with neither being compelled to act and both having reasonable knowledge of relevant facts."
The ATO's general rule: use the cash price you would normally charge a stranger for the same service or goods. If you typically charge $150/hour for design work, that's your valuation benchmark – even when you're working for coffee vouchers.
Services (design, photography, music, writing):
Goods (equipment, products, merchandise):
Space/Facilities (studio time, rehearsal space, accommodation):
Media/Promotional Value:
To defend your valuations if the ATO comes knocking, you need:
Remember: both parties in the exchange need to arrive at the same fair market value. Significant discrepancies between what each party declares will raise red flags.
Here's something non-negotiable: a tax invoice is required for every contra deal. This isn't optional or a nice-to-have – it's mandatory under Australian tax law.
Both parties must issue proper invoices as if it were a cash transaction, even though no money changes hands. This might feel administratively excessive for a casual swap between mates, but it protects both parties and ensures tax compliance.
Your tax invoice must include:
For invoices over $1,000 (including GST), you must also show the buyer's identity or ABN.
Tax invoices must be issued within 28 days of the taxable supply.
If you're not registered for GST, issue a regular invoice (not labelled "tax invoice") including:
Critical warning: If you don't quote your ABN and the payment exceeds $75 (excluding GST), the payer must withhold 49% under the no-ABN withholding rule. Always quote your ABN to avoid this.
The ATO requires you to keep all documentation for at least five years after the transaction completes. This includes:
Inadequate record-keeping can result in penalties up to $5,550 (20 penalty units), disallowed deductions, and extended audit periods.
In-kind transactions need to be recorded properly in your accounting system to maintain accuracy and compliance. The principle is straightforward: record both the income you've earned and the expense (or asset) you've acquired.
When you receive $5,000 worth of web development services in exchange for brand photography:
Your journal entry:
This creates a "net zero" effect on your profit while accurately reflecting the economic activity. Your revenue goes up by $5,000 (assessable income), and your expenses also go up by $5,000 (potentially deductible).
For ongoing trading relationships, many accountants recommend setting up a dedicated "Contra Account" in your chart of accounts:
Benefits of this approach:
If you're GST-registered, both transactions must appear in your Business Activity Statement:
You cannot simply net off contra transactions for GST purposes – each leg must be accounted for independently.
Beyond tax compliance, contra arrangements carry interpersonal and business risks that cash transactions don't. Legal experts at Progressive Legal highlight several common pitfalls:
Service quality issues: When work is traded rather than paid, there's a psychological tendency to deprioritise it. Paid work feels more urgent, so the contra job gets bumped. This creates resentment and damages professional relationships.
Value perception problems: Both parties often feel they're getting "the short end of the stick." The photographer thinks their time is worth more than the web developer's. The web developer feels the photos didn't meet their expectations for the hours invested.
Unclear boundaries: Without formal invoicing and contracts, scope creep becomes rampant. "Just one more small tweak" turns into substantial extra work without additional compensation.
ATO enforcement: The ATO received $155.5 million in funding for its Shadow Economy Compliance Program, specifically targeting unreported income including barter arrangements. Penalties for non-compliance include:
Content creators and influencers are particularly in the crosshairs. The ATO issued specific guidance in April 2023 highlighting that gifted products, sponsored content, and brand partnerships all constitute assessable income.
To help you decide whether a contra arrangement makes sense, consider this framework:
| Factor | Cash Payment | In-Kind/Contra Payment |
|---|---|---|
| Tax complexity | Simple – one income entry | Complex – dual entries, valuation required |
| Cash flow impact | Immediate funds available | No cash received (positive or negative depending on needs) |
| Documentation burden | Standard invoice | Tax invoice + valuation evidence + agreement |
| GST treatment | Straightforward calculation | Must record both sides separately |
| Relationship risk | Lower – clear value exchange | Higher – potential misalignment of expectations |
| Tax deductibility | Claim expense against income | Claim expense but also declare income (net zero profit impact) |
| Record complexity | Moderate | High – 5-year retention of valuation evidence |
| Business priority | Often prioritised | May be deprioritised vs paid work |
| Audit risk | Standard | Higher if poorly documented |
When contra makes sense:
When cash is better:
In-kind and contra payments aren't inherently problematic – they're a legitimate, often beneficial way to collaborate and access resources when cash is tight. But they absolutely must be treated with the same rigour as cash transactions.
The three non-negotiables for creative professionals in Australia:
Think of contra deals like a musical collaboration – they work beautifully when everyone's reading from the same sheet music, but fall apart into dissonance when people are improvising in different keys. Clear agreements, proper documentation, and honest valuations keep everyone in harmony.
The creative economy thrives on collaboration, and in-kind arrangements can facilitate amazing partnerships. Just make sure you're playing by the ATO's rules while you're riffing.
Sign up to receive relevant advice for your business.
